Translating policy into practice and bringing real-world industry insight back into the legislative process is Euralarm’s mission. Today, this role is more important than ever because regulation is becoming increasingly complex and interconnected, particularly with the convergence of digital, cyber and physical security. Our strongest impact in recent years has been in helping shape EU legislation
By: Damir Muharemovic; E-mail: editorial@asadria.com
a&s Adria: Can you please present yourself to our readers, with an emphasys on your professional career and position at Euralarm?
Mita: I am Peter Mita, President of Euralarm, the European association representing the fire safety and security industry. My professional career has been dedicated to advancing safety technologies and fostering collaboration between industry stakeholders, policymakers, and standards bodies.
At Euralarm, I have the privilege of working with experts across Europe to ensure that our sector not only complies with regulation but actively shapes it. Our role is to bring technical expertise into policy discussions and ensure that legislation supports innovation while maintaining the highest levels of safety and security for citizens.
a&s Adria: Euralarm sits between policymakers, standards bodies and the industry. How do you define that role today, and where has the association had the strongest practical impact in recent years?
Mita: Euralarm acts as a bridge—translating policy into practice and bringing real-world industry insight back into the legislative process. Today, this role is more important than ever because regulation is becoming increasingly complex and interconnected, particularly with the convergence of digital, cyber and physical security. Our strongest impact in recent years has been in helping shape EU legislation such as the Cyber Resilience Act and contributing to standardisation efforts. We ensure that technical realities are understood, preventing unintended consequences that could compromise safety or innovation.
a&s Adria: The Cyber Resilience Act is now becoming a reality for manufacturers. What does it actually change for fire safety and security companies, especially those that may not traditionally see themselves as “cyber” businesses?
Mita: The Cyber Resilience Act fundamentally changes how our industry must think about products. Fire safety and security systems are no longer just physical devices—they are connected, digital systems. Even companies that did not consider themselves “cyber” businesses must now address cybersecurity throughout the entire lifecycle of their products, from design to maintenance. This means implementing secure development practices, vulnerability management, and long-term support strategies. Ultimately, it raises the baseline for trust in safety and security technologies.
Serious Consequences of Incorrect Device Classification
a&s Adria: Your organization has published guidance clarifying how products should be classified under the Cyber Resilience Act as default, Important, or Critical. Why does this classification matter so much, and what are the risks if companies misunderstand it?
Mita: Classification determines the level of obligations a manufacturer must meet. If a product is misclassified, companies may either underinvest in security—creating vulnerabilities—or overcomply, increasing costs unnecessarily. For safety-critical systems such as fire detection or access control, incorrect classification can have serious consequences, including increased exposure to cyber threats that could directly impact life safety systems. This is why Euralarm has provided a fact sheet —to ensure clarity and consistency across the industry. The fact sheet also outlines how future harmonised standards under development—such as EN 62443-4-x and other horizontal standards—may support manufacturers in demonstrating conformity and benefiting from presumption of conformity where applicable.
a&s Adria: The association has also raised concerns about the Data Act, particularly provisions that could create new security vulnerabilities. What was the core issue from the industry’s perspective, and what does it reveal about the tension between data access and system security?
Mita: The Data Act aims to improve data accessibility, which is a positive goal. However, from our perspective, some provisions risk weakening system security. Safety and security systems often rely on controlled data environments to maintain integrity. If access is not carefully managed, it could introduce vulnerabilities or enable malicious interference. This highlights a broader tension: enabling data sharing while preserving system resilience. Both are essential, but they must be balanced carefully.
a&s Adria: Another issue the association has addressed is the proposed Digital Networks Act and the shutdown of legacy communication networks. Why could this transition pose risks for fire safety and security systems, and what would a responsible migration strategy look like?
Mita: Many fire and security systems still rely on legacy communication networks that are being phased out. If this transition is not managed properly, critical systems could lose connectivity, compromising their effectiveness. A responsible migration strategy must include risk assessment, backward compatibility where necessary, and clear timelines. Most importantly, safety systems must remain operational at all times during the transition.
a&s Adria: Your recent position on the EU Battery Regulation highlights concerns specific to safety and security systems. Why does battery classification matter so much in this sector, and what could happen if the regulation is applied incorrectly to the installed base across Europe?
Mita: Batteries are essential for ensuring continuity of operation during power outages. If regulations are applied incorrectly, it could lead to unsuitable battery technologies being used or unnecessary replacement of existing systems. This could compromise reliability or impose significant costs without improving safety. The installed base across Europe must be treated carefully to avoid unintended disruptions.
a&s Adria: Critical infrastructure resilience has become a central theme in Euralarm’s recent communications. Why has this topic moved so high on the agenda, and how has the conversation evolved in recent years?
Mita: The risk landscape has changed dramatically. We now face hybrid threats that combine cyber, physical and geopolitical elements. Critical infrastructure—energy, transport, data—has become a target. As a result, resilience is no longer just about preventing incidents but ensuring systems can withstand and recover from them. This shift has elevated the topic to a strategic priority across Europe.
Protecting Critical Infrastructure Is Everyone’s Responsibility
a&s Adria: Guidance published by the association suggests that protecting vital installations is a shared societal responsibility rather than solely an operator’s task. What does that mean in practice for governments, infrastructure operators, system integrators and manufacturers?
Mita: Protecting critical infrastructure cannot be left to operators alone. Governments must provide clear regulatory frameworks and support enforcement. Operators must implement robust systems and processes. Manufacturers must design secure and reliable technologies. System integrators play a key role in ensuring that all components work together effectively. It is a collective effort.
a&s Adria: The association has also highlighted the growing importance of perimeter protection as hybrid threats increasingly combine physical, cyber and informational attack vectors. How should the industry rethink perimeter security in this environment?
Mita: Perimeter security must evolve from being purely physical to being integrated and intelligent. Threats today are multi-layered, combining physical intrusion with cyber manipulation and misinformation. We need systems that can detect, analyse and respond across these domains in real time. Integration and interoperability are key. Euralarm has taken the initiative to start a Perimeter Round Table, bringing together all stakeholders in this field. Together we will be working on more guidance and information in this important field.
a&s Adria: Data centers have emerged as another strategic focus in your recent work. Why should fire safety and physical security in data centers be treated as board level concerns rather than purely technical issues? Where do you see the biggest gaps between regulatory expectations, available technologies and what operators are actually implementing in practice?
Mita: Data centers are now critical infrastructure. Any disruption can have widespread economic and societal impact. Fire safety and security are not just technical issues—they are business continuity issues. The gap we often see is between what technology can provide and what is actually implemented. Greater awareness at board level is needed to close that gap. That is why our association has released several guidance documents and organized webinars focusing on fire safety and security for datacenters.
a&s Adria: The association welcomed the European Commission’s e commerce initiative aimed at tackling non compliant, low cost safety products sold through online platforms. How serious is this issue today, and what enforcement mechanisms does Europe realistically need?
Mita: It is a significant and growing problem. Low-cost, non-compliant products undermine safety, distort competition and erode trust in the market. Europe needs stronger enforcement mechanisms, including better market surveillance and accountability for online platforms.
a&s Adria: The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive is expected to drive a major renovation wave across Europe. You have warned that this process could introduce overlooked fire safety risks, including those linked to new insulation materials, EV charging infrastructure and battery storage. How significant are these risks, and what needs to change?
Mita: The renovation wave driven by energy efficiency goals is essential, but it brings new risks. Materials such as insulation, as well as technologies like EV charging and energy storage, introduce new fire dynamics. Fire safety must be integrated into renovation strategies from the outset—not treated as an afterthought.
a&s Adria: The association has also spoken about attracting young professionals and improving diversity in the sector. How serious is the talent gap today, and what must the industry do to remain capable of meeting increasingly complex regulatory and technological demands?
Mita: The talent gap is a real concern. Our industry is becoming more complex, requiring expertise in digital technologies, cybersecurity and system integration alongside traditional engineering skills. We must attract young professionals, promote diversity and clearly communicate the societal importance of our work. That is why Euralarm started the Euralarm Young Professional initiative – a community designed to engage, educate and empower the next generation of leaders in the fire safety and security industry.
a&s Adria: Finally, what will Euralarm work on in the upcoming period, what will be in the focus of your work?
Mita: Our focus will remain on supporting the implementation of key EU legislation, particularly in cybersecurity and digitalisation. We will continue to advocate for balanced regulation, promote best practices, and strengthen the role of safety and security in broader societal discussions such as sustainability and resilience. Above all, Euralarm will continue to position itself as a trusted voice—bringing expertise, clarity and leadership to a rapidly evolving landscape.
































